What was new on START Web site?
April, 2001
April 29, 2001
"...Today's Russian stand on missile defense and strategic arms reductions issues not only can not prevent US NMD deployment, but will also very likely result in that Moscow won't be able to count on preservation of its equal status in the strategic arms reductions process even for appearance only... In this situtation, the best that Russia can do is to try to minimize consequences of the possible US withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty, and to do everything possible to prevent complete deployment of the US missile defenses even if the ABM Treaty is terminated. Current policy of tying arms reduction issues up to ABM problems has to be revised as the first step in this direction..." (Russian Policy Toward Ballistic Missile Defenses Needs To Be Reassessed, - in Russian, by Pavel Podvig, April 28, 2001).On April 23, in Moscow, consultations took place between experts of Russia and NATO on the problems of the nonproliferation of WMD and their means of delivery. The main attention was devoted to questions of nonproliferation of missiles and missile technologies. According to Russian MFA Press Release, The Russian side showed in a well-reasoned way the absence of changes in the strategic situation that would justify deployment of missile defense systems for the territory of a country, prohibited by the 1972 ABM Treaty, (Russian MFA Press Release, April 23, 2001)
On Russian stand on missile defenses see also:
- Russia Still Opposing NMD Establishment, (by Military News Agency, Russia Today, April 23, 2001)
- "Star Wars". Episode 2001, - in Russian, (by Oleg Odnokolenko, Itogi.ru, April 22, 2001)
President Bush plans a major speech next week in which he will announce plans for a missile defense system but try to reassure allies by tying the shield's deployment to reductions in the U.S. nuclear arsenal:
- Bush Likes Missiles, - in Russian, (by Alexander Shumilin, Izvestia, April 29, 2001)
- Bush Will Talk NMD on May 1st, - in Russian, (Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 28, 2001)
- Bush to Push Missile Shield, Nuclear Arms Cuts Next Week, (by Thomas E. Ricks and Mike Allen, The Washington Post, Friday, April 27, 2001; Page A13)
- Standing Down U.S. and Russian Nuclear Weapons: The Time for Meaningful Action is Now, (Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers Issue Brief, Volume 5, Number 8, April 27, 2001)
- How Much for NMD?, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Lyubetsky, Krasnaya Zvezda, April 27, 2001)
- A New Nuclear Posture for the United States, (Carnegie Endowment for Piece, Proliferation Brief, Vol. 4, Number 9, April 25, 2001)
- Ambitious Plan Urged For U.S. Missile Defense, (by Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times, April 21, 2001, Pg. 1)
On the prospective US strategic nuclear forces see also:
- New Nukes, (by William M. Arkin, The Washington Post, April 23, 2001)
- Declining Strategic Forces, (by Norman Polmar, U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, April, 2001)
"We have seen that the United States want only bombed Yugoslavia and that Yugoslavia had no means to retaliate," China's top arms control official, Sha Zukang, said in an interview. "Once the United States believes it has both a strong spear and a strong shield, it could lead them to conclude that nobody can harm the United States and they can harm anyone they like anywhere in the world. There could be many more bombings like what happened in Kosovo.": China Looks to Foil U.S. Missile Defense System, (by Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, April 29, 2001)
American experts on European and Asian views on NMD:
- Europe's Missile Defense Options, (Tomas Valasek, The Defense Monitor, Center for Defense Information, March 2001)
- Ballistic Missile Defense and Northeast Asian Security: Views from Washington, Beijing, and Tokyo, (Center for Nonproliferation Studies, April 2001)
Col. Gen. Nikolai Solovtsov has been appointed as Commander of the strategic missile force by presidential decree
- Revolution in the Defense Ministry, - in Russian, (by Mikhail Khodaryonok, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 29, 2001)
- Russia: Shaking Up the Brass, (The New York Times, April 28, 2001)
"...The more resources are provided to forces intended for operation in local conflicts that are likely to happen in short-term prospective, the less will stay for the forces intended to repel regional threats (and for Strategic nuclear forces), and the lower will be the "nuclear threshold" should the threat emerge, although its likelihood is much lower and belongs to medium- and long-term forecasting..." (What Wars Can Russia Afford?, - in Russian, by Alexei Arbatov and Pyotr Romashkin, NVO NG, N 15, April 27, 2001).
Arguments of advocates of development of low-yield nuclear weapons are false, believes Dr. Robert W. Nelson, an expert with Federation of American Scientists: Exploding the Myth About Low-Yield, Earth Penetrating Nuclear Weapons, (Robert Nelson, Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers Issue Brief, April 17, 2001)
Russian Nuclear Society appeals to the president to keep the Ministry of atomic energy undivided: Address to President of Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, - in Russian, (Wek, N 17, April 27, 2001)
An analysis of the US Budget requests for US-Russian cooperation in nuclear security see in Analysis of the Bush Administration's Fiscal Year 2002 Budget Requests for U.S.-Former Soviet Union Nuclear Security: Department of Energy Programs, (by William Hoehn, Russian-American Nuclear Security Advisory Council, April 18, 2001)
Exsperts on weapon-grade plutonium disposal:
- Plutonium disposal: The Third Way, (by Allison Macfarlane, Frank von Hippel, Jungmin Kang & Robert Nelson, The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, May-June 2001) - a PDF file
- Plutonium Disposition: Non-Proliferation or Industry Welfare?, (Thomas Skold, European Security Review, Issue 5, Centre for European Security and Disarmament, April 2001)
Duma nears third reading of a set of controversial bills allowing the import and storage of spent nuclear fuel:
- «Spent Nuclear Fuel -- Valuable Product, Not Garbage», - in Russian, (by Anna Kozyreva, Wek, N 17, April 27, 2001)
- We Got Explosive, - in Russian, (by Andrey Stepanov, Moskovskiye Novosti, April 25, 2001)
Recent issue of Yadernaya Bezopasnost' (N 46-47, March-April, 2001) runs (all in Russian, Summary in English available):
- That's too Much, Gentlemen..., (by Mikhail Pogorely)
- Will Minatom Control Its Own Activities? (by Mikhail Silkov)
- Why Nuclear Control Is So Insipid In Russia, (by Irina Yatsunenko)
- We Don’t Want to be a Nuclear Garbage Dump, (by Yelena Mazanova)
- Conversion in Snezhinsk Way, (by Vladimir Dernovoy)
At the Russian START Forum: US NMD deployment, and other topics.
April 22, 2001.
On Tuesday, April 17, 2001 Interfax news agency held a presentation of Russia on the World Arms Market, (by Boris Kuzyk, Nikolai Novichkov, Vladimir Shvarev, Marat Kenzhetayev and Alexander Simakov, Moscow, 2001, 792 pp. Publ. Military Parade Ltd). This book co-authored by our Center's affiliate Marat Kenzhetayev. See also an interview with Boris Kuzyk, General Director of NPK Holding, in Russian (by Vladimir Solovyev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 17, 2001).Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov said he was not optimistic about the prospects of U.S.-Russian dialogue over Washington's proposed national missile defense (NMD): Russia Defense Minister Downbeat on NMD Talks, (by Reuters, Russia Today, April 18, 2001)
Alexander Yakovenko, an official spokesman of Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, commented on the outcome International conference "Outer Space Without Weapons -- an Arena for Peaceful Cooperation in the 21 Century": Space Without Weapons, - in Russian, (by Ksenia Fokina, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 20, 2001) See also: Russia Wants to Tighten Ban on Arms in Space, (by Reuters, Russia Today, April 19, 2001)
Top officials at U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories are concerned that current tensions between Washington and Moscow are starting to harm joint programs to reduce nuclear weapons and secure nuclear materials in Russia: U.S.-Russia Nuclear Programs on Edge, (by Walter Pincus, The Washigton Post, Saturday, April 14, 2001; Page A13). See also: US reviewing aid for non-proliferation programs in Russia, (by Vladislav Nikiforov, Bellona, April 17, 2001)
Russia's State Duma ratified Wednesday the Open Skies Treaty on unarmed military observation flights over signatory nations: Russian Lower House Ratifies Open Skies Treaty, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, April 19, 2001)
Federation of American Scientists published a Public Interest Report arguing against developing of a new generation of precision low-yield nuclear weapons aimed at underground targets: Low-Yield Earth-Penetrating Nuclear Weapons, (by Robert W. Nelson, FAS Public Interest Report, January/February 2001, Volume 54, Number 1):
- Drill-Equipped Nuke, - in Russian, (by Sergey Leskov, Izvestia, April 17, 2001)
- Pentagon Works on a New Nuclear Bomb, - in Russian, (by Vissarion Sisnyev, Trud, April 17 àïðåëÿ, 2001)
- Pentagon is About to Develop a Safe Nuclear Bomb, - in Russian, (Lenta.Ru, April 16, 2001)
- U.S. Studies Developing New Nuclear Bomb, (by Walter Pincus, The Washigton Post, Sunday, April 15, 2001; Page A02)
The West is ready to offer Russia $600 million on disposition of surplus weapon-grade plutonium appeared because of implementation of the US-Russian nuclear arms reduction treaties. However, Russia won't be able to process weapon-grade plutonium unless the necessary $2 billion are raised: Business on Plutonium, - in Russian, (by Mikhail Kozyrev, Vedomosti, April 17, 2001)
Russian State Duma on Wednesday passed in the second reading a set of highly controversial bills allowing the import and storage of spent nuclear fuel:
- Science Wins, - in Russian, (by Gennady Voskresensky, Wek, April 20-27, 2001)
- Let's Talk, - in Russian, (by Gennady Voskresensky, Wek, April 20-27, 2001)
- Green Light to Wastes, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Sadchikov, Izvestia, April 19, 2001)
- Duma Approved Import of Nuclear Fuel, - in Russian, (by Ivan Rodin and Andrey Vaganov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 19, 2001)
- Duma votes to end ban on nuclear waste imports, (by Amelia Gentleman, Guardian, April 19, 2001)
- Nuclear Waste Imports Approved, (by Ana Uzelac, The Moscow Times, April 19, 2001)
- Spent Nuclear Fuel: Poison or Not Poison?, - in Russian, (by Tamara Pikul, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, April 19, 2001)
- Is Russia Reade to Import Nuclear Wastes?, - in Russian, (by Sergey Mitrokhin, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 18, 2001)
- Duma in Favor of Nuclear Deal, - in Russian, (by Ivan Rodin, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 18, 2001)
- Russian Nuclear Gains, - in Russian, (by Olga Shorina, Vesti.Ru, April 18, 2001)
- Nuclear Wastes Won't Help to Clean Russia, - in Russian, (by Sergey Ivashko, Gazeta.Ru, April 18, 2001)
- Who Benefits from Import of Spent Nuclear Fuel?, - in Russian, (by Olga Koleva, Vesti.ru, April 17, 2001)
- The First Press Conference of the New Head of Minatom, - in Russian, (by Andrey Vaganov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 17, 2001)
- Radiological Myths, - in Russian, (open letter from experts, Wek, N 15, April 13-20, 2001)
- Second reading of spent nuclear fuel import bills, (by Rashid Alimov, Bellona, April 16, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: nuclear weapons in space, counter-force potential of precision-guided munitions, and other topics.
April 15, 2001
On Tuesday, April 10, 2001, Carnegie Moscow Center held a seminar on "New Issues in the U.S.-Russian Dialogue: Confidence-Building During Unilateral Strategic Arms Reduction." Rose Gottemoeller, former deputy administrator for defense nuclear nonproliferation in the U.S. Department of Energy, spoke on the prospects of unilateral nuclear reductions and on confidence-building measures aimed to ensure irreversibility of the process. On the same subject, see Gennady Khromov's exclusive comment New Approaches to Arms Control or an Echo of Election Rhetorics? (in Russian).Recent issue of Yadernaya Bezopasnost' (N 44-45, January-February, 2001) runs Precision-Guided Weapons and START-3. How Precision-Guided Weapons Affect Strategic Balance (in Russian) -- an article by Eugene Miasnikov, Editor of START Web-Site. See also brochure Precision-Guided Weapons and Strategic Balance (in Russian) published in November, 2000.
Among other articles published in the issue (all in Russian, Summary in English available):
- America's Achilles' Heel by Mikhail Pogorely
- Deterrence or War Fighting? Nuclear Weapons and Precision Guided Munitions are Intended for Different Use by Vladimir Belous
- Precision-Guided Munitions and Nuclear Weapons -- Who Wins? by Vladimir Dernovoy
- Cruise Missiles: Nuclear or Conventional? by Vladimir Belous
- Verification is Possible if Desired by Gennady Khromov
- Uranium at Zenith, Plutonium in Orbit by Vladimir Kuznetsov
The discussion on future of US-Russian relations provoked by Thomas Graham's article is continued in Moscow asks questions from Washington, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, April 13, 2001)
Speaking at the International Conference "Outer Space Without Weapons - An Arena for Peaceful Cooperation in the 21st Century", Georgy Mamedov, Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs called for the use of the outer space in the interests of international peace and security, further development of international coopertion:
- Russian Urges Space Arms Ban Talks, (By Jim Heintz, The Associated Press, April 11, 2001)
- Georgy Mamedov's Address to the International Conference "Outer Space Without Weapons - An Arena for Peaceful Cooperation in the 21st Century" (April 11, 2001, in Russian)
Vladimir Kryazhev, Vice-Admiral, Ret., speaks on Russian reciprocal measures in return to US's NMD deployment: To Make a Nuclear «Umbrella» is More Expensive than to Make a Hole in It, - In Russian, (by Igor Yavlinsky and Andrey Baranov, Komsomolskaya Pravda, April 12, 2001)
Experts discuss the idea of missile defense for Europe:
- Five Talks and One Breakfast, - in Russian, (by Elmar Guseynov, Izvestia, April 12, 2001)
- Russia Sees Several Regional Missile Shields, (by Reuters, Russia Today, April 12, 2001)
- Missile Defense for Europe is an Offer for Cooperation, - In Russian, (by Maxim Baranov, Parlamentskaya Gazeta, April 10, 2001)
- Schroeder Calls for U.S.-Russia Dialogue on Missile Shield, (Russia Today, April 10, 2001)
Senator Joseph Biden and the Pentagon’s former head of Testing and Evaluation Philip E. Coyle on the current status of the NMD deployment programs: No Inevitability with National Missile Defense, (Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers Issue Brief, April 6, 2001)
The MOU exchange data on the deployed strategic offensive arms of the parties to the START I Treaty, as of January 31, 2001, are published: START I Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, (Bureau of Arms Control, Washington, DC, April 1, 2001)
US Senate approved Warner-Domenici amendment that recommends adding $900 million to the president's budget requests for Department of Energy defense programs. The amendment allows for additional funds for stockpile stewardship and DOE's nonproliferation programs, including cooperation with Russian Minatom. Earlier Bush administration proposed to cut these programs by $100 million.
- A Step Backward on Nuclear Cooperation, by Michael McFaul, The New York Times, April 11, 2001)
- Bush Budget Would Slice Efforts to Limit Russian Nuclear Threat, (Bloomberg.Com, April 10, 2001)
- Nuclear Threat Initiative Releases Statement Regarding President Bush's Budget, Cuts in Nonproliferation Programs, (NTI Press Release, April 10, 2001)
- Senate Adopts Warner-Domenici Amendment Assuming Boost For DOE Defense Programs in 2002, (April 4, 2001)
- Threat-Reduction Aid Needs To Be Increased, (St. Petersburg Times, April 3, 2001)
GAO published a report on the status of the DOE and Minatom cooperative programs on the security of Russian nuclear materials: Nuclear Nonproliferation: Security of Russia's Nuclear Material Improving; Further Enhancements Needed, (Government Accounting Office (GAO) Report, March 2001)
April issue of Arms Control Today includes:
- Toward a New Nuclear Posture: Challenges for the Bush Administration , (by Robert Kerrey and William D. Hartung)
- Top Pentagon Officials Make Case for Layered Missile Defense, (by Wade Boese)
- Bush Administration Blunts International Opposition to NMD, (by Wade Boese)
- Pentagon Report Highlights Hurdles for Missile Defenses, (by Wade Boese)
- Bush Reviews Threat Reduction Programs, Contemplates Cuts, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
- Helms Asks Administration to Reject Arms Control Treaties, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
Russian Retired Vice-Admiral blames the United States for refusing to negotiate an agreement to avoid undersea submarine accidents: Dangerous Tacks, - in Russian, (by Yuri Bystrov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 13, 2001)
Newly appointed Minister of Atomic Energy of Russia Andrey Rumyantsev backs draft bills on import of spent nuclear fuel:
- Nuclear Wastes Leave the Light, - in Russian, (by Alexander Linkov, Parlamentskaya Gazeta, April 11, 2001)
- Parliament Postpones Key Debate on Nuclear Waste, (By Agence France Presse, April 11, 2001)
- Mayak Collective Favors Imports of Spent Nuclear Fuel, (Ivan Novikov, ITAR-TASS, April 11, 2001)
- Minister of Atomic Energy of Russia Andrey Rumyantsev: We won't Bring Nuclear "Garbage" to Russia for Burial, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Kucherenko, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, April 10, 2001)
- Rumyantsev Backs Plan to Import Nuclear Fuel, (by The Associated Press, The Moscow Times, April 9, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: nuclear weapons in space, counter-force potential of precision-guided munitions, and other topics.
April 5, 2001
Thomas Graham's article Questions from Washington: Does Russia Have Sufficient Confidence in its Own Strength to Engage the US Constructively?, - in Russian, (March 21, 2001, p.1,8) provoked a lively discussion in Nezavisimaya Gazeta:
- Questions from Washington and Answers from Moscow, - in Russian, (by Alexander Konovalov, March 30, 2001, p.8)
- Don't Fall into Hysterics, - in Russian, (by Sergey Rogov, March 28, 2001, p.6)
- America in the Soviet "Expansion Space", - in Russian, (by Gleb Pavlovsky, March 27, 2001, p.8)
In his interview for The Washington Post, Pavel Podvig, an expert with our Center, speaking on the Russian proposal on European Missile Defense System, said: "It's a very clumsy attempt to find a compromise, and not very successful in my view... But still, it is very clear that this is part of the message that Putin is sending: 'We do want to be together with the West, with NATO and even with the United States'", (Russia's Skeletal Missile Plan, by Peter Baker, The Washington Post, Tuesday, April 3, 2001; Page A12). See also Moscow Builds Missile Defense for Europe, - in Russian, (by Igor Korotchenko, NVO-NG, March 23, 2001)
Building and maintaining all the major US missile-defense programs will cost far in excess of $100 billion, according to the latest Pentagon figures. However, administration's determination to build the missile shield is yet to be supported by budgetary appropriations:
- U.S. Missile-Defense Costs To Exceed $100 Billion, (By John M. Donnelly, Defense Week, April 2, 2001, p.1)
- No "Star Wars" Appropriations in the Budget, - in Russian, (by Natalia Travkina, Dipcourier, March 22, 2001, p.1)
While validating the need for NMD deployment by missile threats from "rogue" states, the US has no plans to solve the problem by diplomatic means:
- President Bush's Deferral of North Korean Negotiations: A Missed Opportunity to Curb North Korea's Missile Program, (Arms Control Association Press Conference Rush Transcript, March 23, 2001)
- The Rogue State Doctrine and National Missile Defense, (by Ivan Eland and Daniel Lee, Cato Foreign Policy Briefing, March 29, 2001)
A move in the House to increase spending on DOE's nuclear nonproliferation programs by $500 million a year for 10 years failed last week. The Bush administration began a review of these programs, among which are those that pay for reducing Russia's arsenal of leftover cold-war weapons.:
- America Does Not Want to Deprive Russia of Plutonium, - in Russian, (Gazeta.Ru, April 4, 2001)
- House Rules Panel Rejects Effort to Boost Nonproliferation Funding, (by Bill Loveless, Inside Energy, March 31, 2001)
- Effective Nuclear Disarmament, (New York Times, March 31, 2001)
- Russia plays down possible US cut in non-proliferation aid, (Agence France-Presse, March 30, 2001)
- US warns Russia on nuclear spread, (by Toby Harnden, Daily Telegraph, March 30, 2001)
- Bush Puts U.S. Nuclear Aid to Russia Under Review, (by Reuters, Russia Today, March 30, 2001)
- U.S. Reviewing Aid Meant to Contain Russia's Arsenal, (by Judith Miller, The New York Times, March 29, 2001)
- Baker Wants Money for Russia Plan, (by Carolyn Skorneck, The Washington Post, March 29, 2001)
- Baker Says U.S. Must Help Russian Nuclear Storage, (by Reuters, Russia Today, March 29, 2001)
- Press Conference by the President [Excerpt], (The White House, March 29, 2001)
Rationale and Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Forces and Arms Control, a study by National Institute for Public Policy still draws attention in the media:
- The US Proceeds to Review Nuclear Strategy, - In Russian, (by Vladimir Lyubeyky, Krasnaya Zvezda, April 4, 2001)
- Should Bush Proceed With NMD? (by Michelle Ciarrocca, The Moscow Times, March 26, 2001)
Comments on the appointment of a new Minister of Atomic Energy in Russia:
- U.S. Watching Change at Russian Nuclear Energy Ministry Closely, (by Agence France Presse, March 30, 2001)
- New Russian Atomic Energy Chief Good News for U.S., (by Reuters, Russia Today, March 29, 2001)
- Adamov's Dismissal Is A Good Sign For Nuclear Nonproliferation, (PIR Center, news release, March 28, 2001)
Plans to produce MOX fuel in Zheleznogorsk: School of survival for Atomgrad, - in Russian (by Yuri Chuvashev, NG-Regiony, March 27, 2001, p.14)
Opponents who have been fiercely protesting a plan to import 20,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel to Russia won a reprieve Thursday when the State Duma decided to delay a vote on the bill until at least early April. However, even if the plan becomes law, external pressure from the United States may still be able to thwart it by slashing its list of potential clients, the U.S. could even veto Russia's storage of the spent fuel if it deems safety standards insufficient:
- A Nuclear Portfolio for A New Minister, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Kucherenko, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, April 5, 2001)
- Activists Win Reprieve in Nuclear Fight, (by Yevgenia Borisova, The Moscow Times, March 23, 2001)
- U.S. May Oppose Moscow's Plans to Import Spent Nuclear Fuel, (Sophie Lambroschini, RFE/RL, March 21, 2001)
Accusing Russia of selling "nuclear secrets", Washington fails to provide any evidence:
- Russia Is Not Going To Give Up Cooperation With Iran, - in Russian, (by Lidiya Andrusenko, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 5, 2001)
- Why to Pull Persian Carpet from under Moscow?, - In Russian, (by Yevgeni Umerenkov, Komsomolskaya Pravda, April 3, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: prospects of renewal of the B-2 strategic bomber production, of the deployment of nuclear weapons in space, and other topics.
What Was New?
In 2001: January | February | March
In 2000: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1999: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1998: January | February | March | April | May | June | July-September | October | November | December
In 1997: November | December
Search the START Web Site
© Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, 1999-2001