What was new on START Web site?
June, 2001
June 28, 2001
Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies released a report U.S.-Russian Relations in Nuclear Arms Reductions: Current State and Prospects, - in Russian, (ed. by Anatoli Diakov). The report is addressed to a wide audience -- politicians, military, weapons designers, experts in international law, and to everyone interested in international security issues.The main outcome of the US-Russian summit was establishment of friendly personal relations between the presidents. A breakthrough on the missile defenses problem did not happen, however both sides declared their readiness to continue the dialogue.
- Press Conference by President George W. Bush and Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, June 16, 2001.
- Press Briefing by Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, June 16, 2001.
Media and expert comment the results of the summit emphasizing that it was doomed to success:
- Don't Hedge, - in Russian, (Profile, June 25, 2001)
- The New Nuclear Danger, (by Jonathan Schell, The Nation, June 25, 2001)
- George W. Bush under Rain of Reproaches, -in Russian, (by Yevgeniy Petrov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 23, 2001)
- Revision of the Ljubljana Summit, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 22, 2001)
- Russia Shaken by US NMD, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyev, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, June 22, 2001)
- Ljubljana Summit Showed: They Succeeded in Avoiding the Crisis, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev and Yevgeni Grigoryev, Dip Courier, June 21, 2001)
- The Fight for Global Domination Continues, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Volkov, - in Russian, Dip courier, June 21, 2001)
- Chess Game of World Policy, - in Russian, (by Nataliya Travkina, Dip Courier, June 21, 2001)
- NMD is not Panacea for US, - in Russian, (by Irina Tolstikova, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 21, 2001)
- To See the Soul and Stop Talking, - in Russian, (by Andrei Piontkovskiy, Novaya Gazeta, June 21, 2001)
- Powell Says MAD Is Indispensable, (by Jonathan Wright, The Washington Times, June 21, 2001)
- Senator Criticizes Bush On Russia, (by Laurence McQuillan, USA Today, June 21, 2001)
- A Delicate Nuclear Balance, (by Anatol Lieven, The New York Times, June 21, 2001)
- Slashing The Nuclear Threat, (Chicago Tribune, June 20, 2001)
- Mikhail Margelov: We Have Marriage of Convenience with the US, - in Russian, (by Svetlana Barayeva, Izvestia, June 19, 2001)
- A Promising Start With Russia, (The New York Times, June 18, 2001)
- Cordial Rivals: How Bush And Putin Became Friends, (by Jane Perlez, The New York Times, June 18, 2001)
- Putin's China Card, (by William Safire, The New York Times, June 18, 2001).
- Putin More Open To Missile Defense, Bush Says, (by Judy Keen, USA Today, June 18, 2001)
- Defending Against Missile Attack, The Smart Way, (by Steve Chapman, Chicago Tribune, June 17, 2001)
- Putin Urges Bush Not to Act Alone on Missile Shield, (by Frank Bruni, The New York Times, June 17, 2001)
- Russia's Tender Pride, (by Masha Lipman, The Washington Post, Saturday, June 16, 2001; Page A21)
- Pushing Missile Defense, (Online NewsHour, June 13, 2001) - a discussion with Jacqueline Grapin, Dieter Dettke, Alexander Pikayev and Richard Perle
According to Marshal Igor Sergeyev, Adviser to the Russian President on problems of strategic stability, consultations between U.S. and Russian defense ministries on problems of strategic offensive systems, ballistic missile defense and non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction will be held in the end of June - early July, : On forthcoming Consultations between U.S. and Russian defense ministries on problems of strategic offensive systems and missile defense, - in Russian, (Strana.Ru, June 28, 2001)
On a press conference last Saturday in Kremlin, Vladimir Putin voiced again the orthodox position of the Russian military and political establishment, essentially dismissing previous statements on possible changes in the 1972 ABM Treaty. "If the ABM Treaty ceases to exist, then START-I and START-II treaties will cease to exist. This means that all countries, including Russia, will be legally able to deploy cluster warheads with nuclear weapons on their missiles... This is the least expensive answer, which no one will be able to counter in the near 50, may be even 100 years," he said.
- Putin Threatened with Virtual Warheads, (by Viktor Litovkin, Obschaya Gazeta, June 28, 2001)
- A Headache Due to Warheads. What Is Behind of Our Answer to Bush?, - in Russian, (by Boris Yunanov, Obschaya Gazeta, June 28, 2001) - an interview with Alexei Arbatov, Deputy Chair of the State Duma Defense Committee
- Putin Gives Answers for the Next 100 Years, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 26, 2001)
- Putin's Futile Warhead-Rattling, (by R. James Woolsey, The Washington Post, Tuesday, June 26, 2001; Page A17).
- The Answer for 100 Years, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safronov, Izvestia, June 25, 2001)
- Cold War Coming, - in Russian, (by Il'ya Bulavinov, Kommersant, June 25, 2001)
- Kremlin's Preventive Strike, - in Russian, (by Yuri Golotyuk, Vremya Novostey, June 25, 2001)
- Just What Game Is Putin Playing?, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, June 24, 2001)
- Powell Dismisses Putin Warning on Missiles, (The New York Times, June 24, 2001)
- Answers of the President of Russian Federation on Questions of Journalists upon Completion of the Russian-American Extended Staff Summit Talks, - in Russian, June 23, 2001
- "Satan" for Washington, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 21, 2001)
- Powell has no Fear for Warheads, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Tuchkov, Vesti.Ru, June 21, 2001)
- Invitation To An Arms Race, (The New York Times, June 20, 2001)
- Putin Says Russia Would Counter U.S. Shield, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, June 19, 2001).
- Putin Is Upbeat On U.S. Ties, (by Susan B. Glasser, The Washington Post, Tuesday, June 19, 2001; Page A01)
- The Talk of the President of Russian Federation Vladimir Putin with Chief Representatives of Leading American Media, - in Russian, June 18, 2001
More than 530 arms control experts, officials and journalists gathered for the Carnegie International Non-Proliferation Conference in Washington, June 18 and 19. Available on the Web are speeches by Marshal Igor Sergeyev, advisor to the president on strategic stability, Russian Federation, Senator Richard G. Lugar , Honorable Abdul Sattar, Foreign Minister of Pakistan, Senator Joseph R. Biden, Jr. è Charles B. Curtis, president and chief operating officer, Nuclear Threat Initiative. Other materials presented at the conference will be available on the Web soon.
On June 18, 2001, the newly updated sixth edition of the joint Monterey Institute-Carnegie Endowment Nuclear Status Report was released at the Carnegie Endowment’s Nonproliferation Conference in Washington, D.C. A full electronic version of the report is available on the CNS and Carnegie websites: Status Report: Nuclear Weapons, Fissile Material, and Export Controls in the Former Soviet Union (June 2001)
Natural Resources Defense Council published a report Exposing the U.S. Nuclear War Plan. The NRDC nuclear war plans project uses a computer simulation to reveal what nuclear conflict would look like if it occurred today. The results are clear. A "precision" attack against Russia's nuclear forces -- with an arsenal of about 1,300 warheads -- would kill 8 to 12 million people and injure millions more, while destroying most of Russia's nuclear weapons. In a "counter value" attack, the U.S. could kill or injure up to 50 million Russians with a mere 3 percent of its current arsenal of more than 7,000 strategic warheads.
- A Do-It-Yourself SIOP, (by Bret Lortie, The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, July-August, 2001)
- Dropping The Bomb, (by John Barry and Evan Thomas, Newsweek, June 25, 2001)
- Study Says Russia Might Keep Missiles In Face Of U.S. Shield, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 20, 2001; Page A08)
- Exposing the U.S. Nuclear War Plan, (NRDC, June 2001)
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on the Bush administration Defense Strategy Review. He explained the administration's plans to build and deploy a national missile defense system and the need for the United States to abrogate the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
- Toward 21st-Century Deterrence, (Donald H. Rumsfeld, Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Testimony on National Missile Defense before the Senate Armed Services Committee, June 21, 2001
An internal Defense Department study concluded last year that testing on the national missile defense program was behind schedule and unrealistic and had suffered too many failures to justify deploying the system in 2005, a year after the Bush administration is considering deploying one:
- Pentagon Study Casts Doubt on Missile Defense Schedule, (by James Dao, The New York Times, June 25, 2001)
- Crash Program for Missile Defense May Be Just That, (by John M. Donnelly, Los Angeles Times, Monday, June 25, 2001)
- Skeptical Senators Question Rumsfeld On Missile Defense, (by James Dao, The New York Times, June 22, 2001)
- Testimony Before the Senate Armed Services Committee: Defense Strategy Review As Given by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Hugh Shelton, Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC, Thursday, June 21, 2001.
- No Defense for the Missile Shield, (by Mary McGrory, The Washington Post, Thursday, June 21, 2001; Page A03)
- Experts Counter Bush On Missile Shield Tests, (by Steven Mufson, The Washington Post, Saturday, June 16, 2001; Page A16)
- Troubled System Shows Hurdles Missile-Defense Plans Will Face, (by Carla Anne Robbins, Wall Street Journal, June 15, 2001)
Some American experts believe that Washington should take a realistic approach to the missile defense issues and offer Russia and Europe cooperation in development of theater missile defense system:
- U.S. Offer To Share Missile Defenses Could Quiet Critics, (by Morton M. Kondracke, Rall Call, June 18, 2001)
- Defending missile defense, (by James E. Goodby, Kenneth Weisbrode, San Francisco Chronicle, June 14, 2001)
- Nuclear 'Milestone' Divides U.S., Russia, (by Peter Baker, The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 13, 2001)
The Bush administration will ask Congress for $7.9 billion to support a revamped missile defense program in fiscal year 2002, which is $2.2 billion more than the figure included in an earlier "placeholder" defense budget:
- Budget Plan Contains Shifts For Several BMD Efforts, (by Kerry Gildea, Defense Daily, June 26, 2001)
- Bush Administration Plans Major Changes To Missile Defense Programs, (by Thomas Duffy, Inside Defense, June 25, 2001)
Some observers believe that Bush administration changes emphasis in the commitment to deploy a space-based missile-defense system: they are now focusing on the research and development, and focusing less on a commitment to deploy:
- ABM Treaty Not Dead Yet, Bush White House Hints, (by Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times, June 22, 2001)
- Senate Democrats Discern Softening On Missile Defense, (by Dave Boyer, The Washington Times, June 22, 2001)
- U.S. To Adhere To Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, For Now, (by Brian Knowlton, International Herald Tribune, June 18, 2001)
The Pentagon has prepared a contract that would allow it to begin readying a site for a national missile defense system at Fort Greeley, Alaska, as early as this August, according to U.S. defense officials: Pentagon Is Preparing Contract For Missile-Defense System Site, (by Greg Jaffe and Carla Anne Robbins, Wall Street Journal, June 28, 2001)
Supporters of full-scale NMD deployment accuse president Bush of insufficient determination:
- Which Bush on missile defense?, (by Frank J. Gaffney Jr., The Washington Times, June 26, 2001)
- Bush Can Follow Reagan's Lead In Policy On Missile Defense, (by U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon, Philadelphia Inquirer, June 20, 2001)
- Accidental Launch Wake-Up Call, (by James Hackett, The Washington Times, June 22, 2001)
On Japan's views of the U.S. NMD see Japan and Ballistic Missile Defense, (by Michael Swaine, Rachel Swanger, Takashi Kawakami, RAND publication, June 2001)
Russia test-fired a 26-year-old SS-19 Stiletto ballistic missile, hinting the weapon could gain new life as a "hydra-headed" countermeasure if the United States moved forward with President Bush's defense plans: "URs" Are On the Guard of Homeland, - in Russian, (by Yuri Golotyk, Vremya Novostei, June 28, 2001)
In an effort to decrease the dangers posed by nuclear weapons in the post-Cold War era, Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Representative John Spratt (D-SC), and Representative Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) introduced the Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 2001 (NTRA). The bill is based on three principles: reducing the numbers of nuclear warheads, removing as many weapons as feasible from high alert status, and preventing the diversion of Russian nuclear weapons, expertise, and weapons-usable materials: Lawmakers Introduce "Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 2001," (Nuclear Threat Reduction Campaign, 27 June 2001). See also the recent GAO report: Cooperative Threat Reduction: DOD Has Adequate Oversight of Assistance, but Procedural Limitations Remain, (GAO-01-694, June 19, 2001) - in PDF format
The Bush administration on Wednesday submitted to Congress an amended defense budget that proposes a one-third reduction in the air force's fleet of B-1B Lancers as a possible first step toward a unilateral reduction in the nation's nuclear arsenal. The Pentagon will also ask Congress for permission to begin scrapping all 50 of its nuclear-tipped MX missiles and move ahead with converting two Trident submarines to SSGNs:
- Pentagon to Ask for Retirement of MX Missiles, (by James Dao, The New York Times, June 28, 2001)
- Proposed Defense Budget Trims B-1B Bomber Fleet, (by The Associated Press, International Herald Tribune, June 28, 2001)
- Bush moves to convert Trident subs, (by Bruce I. Friedland, Florida Times-Union, June 28, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Will Call for Big Cut in B-1 Bombers, Officials Say, (by James Dao, The New York Times, June 27, 2001)
- For B-1 Bomber Fleet, Air Force Determines Less Is More, (Inside Defense, June 27, 2001)
Pentagon is considering buying 40 new B-2 strategic bombers, for $735 million each: Stealth Bomber, Once Scorned, Gains Fresh Backing, (by James Dao, The New York Times, June 26, 2001)
In the recent issue of The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, (July-August, 2001):
- The new-nuke chorus tunes up, (by Stephen I. Schwartz)
- Eyes in the sky, (by Hui Zhang & Frank N. von Hippel)
- Russia: Surveying the nuclear cities (by Jon B. Wolfsthal)
- Missile defense: Two steps forward, two steps back, (by John Isaacs)
- NRDC Notebook: French Nuclear Forces, 2001
American nuclear arsenal is as vulnerable to terrorists as the Russian one: 'Stealing' U.S. Nukes, (by Danielle Brian, The Washington Post, Thursday, June 21, 2001; Page A24)
After the powerful lobby forced through Russian Duma draft laws that allow import of spent nuclear fuel, the opponents' last hope was that the bill will be rejected by Senate (Federation Council). The hope was not justified. Yegor Stroyev, Senate Speaker said that the bill will be submitted to president Putin without consideration in the upper legislative chamber:
- Minister Promised that the President Will Become Green, - in Russian, (by Pavel Veretennikov, Gazeta.Ru, June 28, 2001)
- The heads of the largest Russian nuclear scientific institutions support the bills on reprocessing of the spent nuclear fuel, - in Russian, (RIA "Novosti", June 28, 2001)
- We won't Give Away Kurils - We'll Give Away Syberia, - in Russian, (by Aman Tuleyev, Novaya Gazeta, June 25, 2001)
- Senate Golf, - in Russian, (by Mikhail Vinogradov, Izvestia, June 25, 2001)
The June 25 issue of Novaya Gazeta is devoted to analyses of man-caused catastrophes, which as some experts believe, will become a major problem for Russia: Period of Disintegration, in Russian, (Novaya Gazeta, June 25, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: START I limitations on movement of mobile missiles, comparison of the costs of Soviet missiles, sources of information on nuclear weapons design, and other topics.
June 14, 2001
US President Bush and Russia's president, Vladimir V. Putin, will meet for the first time in Ljubljana, Slovenia on June 16. Future of the 1972 ABM Treaty will be the key point of the agenda
- Bush May Realign Moscow Relations, (by Alan Sipress, The Washington Post, Thursday, June 14, 2001; Page A35)
- Nuclear 'Milestone' Divides U.S., Russia, (by Peter Baker, The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 13, 2001)
- When Bush Meets Putin, (by Sam Nunn, The Washington Post, June 12, 2001, Pg. 25)
- Denationalization of BMD, - in Russian, (by Irina Kobrinskaya, Expert, June 11, 2001)
- Mr. Putin, Meet Mr. Bush: Who Needs Treaties? (by Thom Shanker, The New York Times, June 10, 2001)
- BMD and the Presidents, - in Russian, (by Alexander Sabov, Rossijskaya Gazeta, June 9, 2001)
- Together with America or Separately?, - in Russian, (by Vitaly Tsygichko, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 9, 2001)
- New Arms Race for the World, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyev, Nezavisimoye Voeyennoe Obozreniye, June 8, 2001)
- What Bush, Putin Won't Talk About, (by Alistair Millar and Brian Alexander, Cleveland Plain Dealer, June 8, 2001)
- Once Broken, the ABM Treaty is Dead, - in Russian, (by Evgenij Grigoryev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 8, 2001)
- U.S. courts Russia with missile-defense offer, (by Alexander Golts, The Russia Journal, June 8, 2001)
- Impact of NMD on Russia, Nuclear Security, (by Dr. Bruce Blair, Center for Defense Information, June 2001)
- Building a Dialogue Around Defense, (by Michelle Ciarrocca, The Moscow Times, June 5, 2001)
- Missile Shield Realities, (The New York Times, June 4, 2001)
- Framing Missile Defense, (The Washington Post, Monday, June 4, 2001; Page A18)
- No One Is Fooled by NMD, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, May 31, 2001)
- The Only Hope for Real 'Progress' On Missile Defense, (Center for Security Policy, May 29, 2001)
- A New Stage of the NMD Debate: A U.S. Proposal and a Russian Response, (By Nikolai Sokov, Monterey Institute of International Studies, May 31, 2001)
Thomas Graham's new article continues the discussion in Nezavisimaya Gazeta: Rethinking US-Russian Relations, - in Russian, (by Thomas Graham, Jr., Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 31, 2001)
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov warned Washington that its withdrawal from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty would shatter the entire system of arms control agreements:
- Russia is Ready for a Dialog on BMD, but within the Frames of ABM Treaty of 1972 only, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Strana.Ru, June 13, 2001)
- Russian Reiterates Stand in Favor of ABM Pact, (by James Dao, The New York Times, June 9, 2001)
- Ready to Negotiate, - in Russian, (by Svetlana Babayeva, Izvestia, June 9, 2001)
- Sergey Ivanov confirmed Russian position: if ABM Treaty loses force, the subsequent treaties that were based on it will also lose force, - in Russian, (RIA "Novosti", June 5, 2001)
- Russia Warns U.S. On Missile Pact, (by The Associated Press, Tuesday June 5 8:53 AM ET)
- Russia reasserts need to preserve ABM, (by The Associated Press, Russia Journal, June 5, 2001)
- Washington to Go Roundabout Way, - in Russian, (by Vadim Markushin, Krasnaya Zvezda, June 2, 2001)
- ABM Treaty Won't be Changed for S-300, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 31, 2001)
President Bush told NATO allies the time had come to banish the last vestiges of the Cold War by developing a security framework based on ballistic missile defenses, but European leaders insisted that any new strategy must include respect for existing arms control pacts:
- A Contact with Europe, - in Russian, (by Alexander Shumilin, Izvestiya, June 14, 2001)
- France and Germany Caution Bush on Missile Defense Plan, (by Frank Bruni, The New York Times, June 14, 2001)
- Bush: 'set aside' ABM Treaty, (By Joseph Curl, The Washington Times, June 14, 2001)
- Bush Tries to Sell NATO on Missile Defense Plan, (by William Drozdiak and Dana Milbank, The Washington Post, Thursday, June 14, 2001; Page A01)
- Criticism Greets Bush As Europe Trip Begins, (by Dana Milbank, The Washington Post, June 13, 2001)
- In Spain, Bush Sells Missile Plan, Calling '72 Arms Treaty a 'Relic', (by Frank Bruni, The New York Times, June 13, 2001)
- Bush: "ABM Treaty Is Relic", - in Russian, (Utro.Ru, June 13, 2001)
- Bush Failed To Persuade Schroeder and Chirac, - in Russian, (SMI.ru, June 13, 2001)
US State Secretaries failed to fulfil their main task -- to overturn scepticism of European allies towards NMD plans:
- Rumsfeld Calls on Europe to Rethink Arms Control, (by James Dao, New York Times, June 11, 2001)
- No Accord in NATO, - in Russian, (by Evgeniy Grigoryev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 9, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Seeks NATO Support, (by William Drozdiak, The Washington Post, June 8, 2001)
- More Pins Prick Bush's Missile Defense, (by Peter Grier, Christian Science Monitor, June 5, 2001)
- Head of Pentagon to Advance in Europe, - in Russian, (by Gennady Sysoyev, Kommersant, June 4, 2001)
- ABM Treaty Dropped By NATO Amid 'Changing Circumstances', (By Christine Kucia, BASIC, May 31, 2001)
- Their Barrels and Our Pipes, - in Russian, (by Vitaly Dymarsky, Rossijskaya Gazeta, May 31, 2001)
- NATO vs Bush, - in Russian, (by Michael Filips, Vedomosti, May 31, 2001)
- Powell Failed in Budapest, - in Russian, (SMI.ru, May 30, 2001)
- Nato baulks at US missile plan, (BBC News, May 29, 2001)
Calculations show that if an ABM system makes a boost phase or midcourse interception, the debris will not fall down as it would happen in anti-aircraft defences, but will continue the flight and will be able to fall on the territories of countries that happen to lie on the way of the missile, hundreds and thousands kilometers from both the launch site and from the target: Where will the Debris Fall?, - in Russian, (by Victor Koltunov, Stanislav Rodionov, and Yuli Tsyba, Nezavisimoye Voeyennoe Obozreniye, June 8, 2001)
On possible reaction of China on the US NMD deployment see:
- The Impact of U.S. NMD on Chinese Nuclear Modernization, (By Li Bin, Pugwash Report, April 2001)
- Missile Defense and East Asia, (By John Rhinelander, Pugwash Report, March 2001)
The Bush administration is considering a crash effort to put into place a rudimentary missile defense system before the end of President Bush's current term in 2004. The new Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee said that he would fight any bid to build a ballistic missile-defense system that was not fully tested and proved to work:
- Senate Arms Chair Vows Fight Over Missile System, (by Jonathan S. Landay, Philadelphia Inquirer, June 9, 2001)
- Missile Defense Speedup Weighead, (by Steven Mufson and Mary Pat Flaherty, The Washington Post, June 8, 2001)
- Democrats Grill Defense Nominees on Arms Control, (by Vernon Loeb, The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 6, 2001; Page A06)
- Missile Defenses Need More Tests, Key Senator Says, (by Thom Shanker, The New York Times, June 1, 2001)
- Technological Challenges in National Missile Defense, (by Colonel Daniel Smith, USA (Ret.), Center for Defense Information, June 2001)
- Senate to Tie George W. Bush's Hands, - in Russian, (by Olga Berezintseva, Kommersant, May 31, 2001)
In the June's issue of Arms Control Today:
- Coup de Grace, (by Spurgeon M. Keeny, Jr.)
- The Continuing Impact of the Nuclear Revolution, (by Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky)
- Missing the Forest for the Trees: U.S. Non-Proliferation Programs in Russia, (by Leonard S. Spector)
- Decision Time for the HEU Deal: U.S. Security vs. Private Interests, (by Thomas L. Neff)
- Bush Pushes New Strategic Framework, Missile Defenses, (by Wade Boese)
- Missile Defense Consultations Abroad Yield Little Progress, (by Wade Boese)
- Congress Responds to Bush Missile Plans Along Party Lines, (by Wade Boese)
- Russia, Belarus Move Toward Open Skies Treaty Ratification, (by Wade Boese)
- Energy Official, GAO Testify on DOE Threat Reduction Efforts, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
- Senate Narrowly Confirms Bolton To Top Arms Control Post, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
- Fire Shuts Down Russian Early-Warning System, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
Experts of Federation of American Scientists, Natural Resources Defense Council and Union of Concerned Scientists published a report that argues for the need to reduce US nuclear arsenals downto 1000-1500 warheads: "Toward True Security: A US Nuclear Posture for the Next Decade" (June, 2001) - a PDF file. See also:
- Bush Missile Defense Plan Could Backfire, Group Says, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 6, 2001; Page A10)
- Scientists Want Nuclear Arsenal Cut, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Tuesday June 5 6:03 PM ET)
- Report Warns of Russian Threat and Offers New Nuclear Vision. Experts Reveal Dangers in Outdated US Nuclear Weapons Strategy, (Union of Concerend Scientists, June 5, 2001)
- N-Weapons Need Costly Overhaul, (by Jonathan S. Landay, Salt Lake Tribune (Knight Ridder News Service), June 1, 2001)
A report by Hans Kristensen, an expert of the Nautilus Institute, criticizes Washington's current nuclear policy: Declassified Documents Show Excessive Military Influence On Nuclear Reviews, (by Hans Kristensen, Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development, May 30, 2001) - a PDF file.
In accordance with the Decree of the President of Russian Federation of March 24, 2001, Strategic Rocket Forces and Space Forces are separate branches as of June 1, 2001:
- A One Branch More, - in Russian, (by Sergey Grigoryev, Nezavisimoye Voeyennoe Obozreniye, June 8, 2001)
- Unarmed to Space, - in Russian, (by Victor Siryk, Parlamentskaya Gazeta, 9 èþíÿ 2001 ã.)
- Our Answer to Washington, - in Russian, (by Alek Akhundov, Dmitri Safonov, Izvestia, June 2, 2001)
- Space under Control Again. Now Military in Charge, - in Russian, (by Victor Siryk, Parlamentskaya Gazeta, June 2, 2001)
- "Space in Epaulets" Stays on Orbit , - in Russian, (by Alexandr Dolinin, Krasnaya Zvezda, June 1, 2001)
- Russian Space Forces Proceed to Fulfil Their Tasks, (Strana.ru, June 1, 2001)
A Russian air defense S-300 missile exploded at a military base near Moscow on Friday, spilling burning fuel but hurting no one. Three other launchers were damaged by debris and fire.
- Defense missile explodes at launchpad, (The Russia Journal, June 9, 2001)
- S. Ivanov denies explosion at launchpad, (The Russia Journal, June 9, 2001)
- Moscow Defenseless under Missile Threat, - in Russian, (by Sergey Dyupin, Ivan Safronov, Kommersant, June 9, 2001)
- S-300 Burns but doesn't Perish, - in Russian, (by Boris Revokatov, Parlamentskaya Gazeta, June 9, 2001)
State Duma passed bills that allow import of spent nuclear fuel:
- The Secret of Nuclear Repository, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Starostin, Vesti.Ru, June 10, 2001)10 èþíÿ 2001 ã.)
- Minatom Ready for a Dialogue with US on Import of SNF, - in Russian, (Strana.Ru, June 9, 2001)
- Alexander Yakovenko, the Official Spokesman of Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Answers a Question from Russian Media in Connection with Statements by Spokesmen for State Department of the United States About Plans of Russia to Import Spent Nuclear Fuel from Foreign Countries, (Russian MFA, June 9, 2001)
- Atomic Energy -- a Promising Field, - in Russian, (by Robert Nigmatullin, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 9, 2001)
- Minatom Got Approval, - in Russian, (by Ivan Rodin, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 7, 2001)
- Consider Import of Western Spent Fuel to Russia as a Spent Issue, - in Russian, (by Roman Shleynov, Novaya Gazeta, June 7, 2001)
- State Dume Promises $1 Billion a Year, - in Russian, (by Irina Rybalchenko, Kommersant, June 6, 2001)
- Arbat Traffic Stops for Waste Debate, (by Ana Uzelac, The Moscow Times, June 4, 2001)
- Money from Nuclear Stockroom. The Country will get Rich on Wastes, - in Russian, (by Gennedy Voskresensky, Vek, N 21, June 1, 2001)
Academician Victor Orlov on the prospects of nuclear energy: Atomic Sun of Russia, - in Russian, (by Maxim Leguyenko, Utro.ru, June 7, 2001), see also the second part of the interview.
Prospects of nuclear energy -- object of a heated discussin in the US as well: New Focus on an Old Nuclear Problem, (by Matthew L.Wald, The New York Times, June 4, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: comparison of the costs of Soviet missiles, ampoulization of ICBMS, US motives behind the offer to buy S-300, and other topics.
What Was New?
In 2001: January | February | March | April | May
In 2000: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1999: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1998: January | February | March | April | May | June | July-September | October | November | December
In 1997: November | December
Search the START Web Site
© Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, 1999-2001