What was new on START Web site?
November, 2001
November 27, 2001
The outcomes of the November Summit are still debated by arms control experts. According to Pavel Podvig, an expert of our Center, despite the willingness of both leaders to cut nuclear arsenals to around 2000 warheads each, the number of nuclear weapons that would remain in service is still far larger than any country would ever need. Thus, the task of further reducing the size of nuclear forces remains as important today as it has been before (Ending the Cold War Once and For All. Trust isn't enough. It takes treaties, by Pavel Podvig, GlobalBeat, November 15, 2001). See also:
- Arms breakthrough buried in the fine print, (by Donald Lambro, The Washington Times, November 26, 2001)
- Strategic Control Out Of Focus, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyev, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, November 23, 2001) - an interview with Sergey Rogov, Director of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institue for USA and Canada Studies
- What Do We Need From America?, - in Russian, (by Andrey Kozyrev, Moskovskiye Novosti, November 22, 2001)
- What Did Putin Brought From Overseas, - in Russian, (by Pavel Zimin, Utro.ru, November 21, 2001)
- Storm In Malta, Downpour In Texas, - in Russian, (by Leonid Nikolayev, Sovetskaya Rossiya, November 20, 2001)
- Presidents Bring The Countries To Friendly Terms, - in Russian, (by Andrey Milovzorov, Utro.ru, November 20, 2001)
- Let's move beyond Cold War thinking, (by Lisbeth Gronlund and David Wright, Boston Globe, November 18, 2001)
- Strategic Capitulation, - in Russian, (by Gennady Zyuganov, Sovetskaya Rossiya, November 18, 2001)
- Trust, But Codify. Nuclear arms reduction requires a treaty, not just a handshake, (by William D. Hartung, GlobalBeat, November 16, 2001)
- The Limits of U.S.-Russian Friendship. Putin has to worry about his domestic critics on the ABM Treaty, (by Kimerly Marten Zisk, GlobalBeat, November 16, 2001)
- Look Deep Into Putin's Eyes and Seal the Deal (Lee Feinstein, Carnegie Endowment for Peace, Proliferation Brief, Volume 4, Number 18, Thursday, November 15, 2001)
US National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice confirmed again that the time is coming where US NMD testing programs will start to bump up against the constraints of the treaty, and since US are not going to violate the treaty, they will withdraw from it either together with Russia or unilaterally:
- White House sees US out of ABM pact, (by Associated Press, November 19, 2001)
- NBC News' Meet the Press, with Condoleezza Rice, National Security Adviser, November 18, 2001
The next test of the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle, a prototype interceptor for the U.S. NMD under development is scheduled for Thursday: Raytheon missile killer's next test Thursday, (by Alan D. Fisher, Arizona Daily Star, Sunday November 25 08:36 AM EST)
US withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty would not trigger a new arms race, believes Pavel Podvig: For Russia, little loss, little gain, (by Pavel Podvig, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November-December, 2001)
Although in her recent interview Condoleezza Rice stressed, that the funding of Nunn-Lugar program for 2002 was not cut, the facts speak differently:
- Safeguard Russia's Nukes, (by David S. Broder, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 25, 2001; Page B07)
- Correcting the Record: Condoleezza Rice's Statement on Nunn-Lugar on Meet The Press, (RANSAC News Release, November 20, 2001)
- Will Bonhomie Smooth Bumpy Road? (by Natalia Yefimova, The Moscow Times, Monday, Nov. 19, 2001, Page 1)
- The Specter of Nuclear Terror, (The New York Times, November 19, 2001)
- We Must Act As If He Has The Bomb, (by Graham Allison, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 18, 2001; Page B01)
- Testimony of Leonard S. Spector, before the Subcommittee on International Security, Nonproliferation, and Federal Services, U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, November 14, 2001
- GAO Testimony: Nuclear Nonproliferation: Coordination of U.S. Programs Designed to Reduce the Threat Posed by Weapons of Mass Destruction, 14 November 2001 (PDF format)
Last week, Russian Government examined the radioactive materials transportation security issues. Although there were no accidents on the transportation routes over the period of 50 years, some believe that the subject is rather topical.
- Territory Of Extraordinary Safety, - in Russian, (by Alexander Belov, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, November 24, 2001)
- Dangerous Cargo On A Secret Route, - in Russian, (by Ivan Sas, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 23, 2001)
- Secret Trains, - in Russian, (by Mikhail Klasson, Vremya MN, November 23, 2001)
- Where Does The Nuclear Track Go, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Petrov, Wek, N 46, November 23, 2001)
- Minatom Careful Over Nuclear Wastes, - in Russian, (by Sergey Ivashko, Gazeta.ru, November 23, 2001)
November 18, 2001
Most of the comments agree that the major positive outcome of the Summit was the accentuated resolve to build fundamentally new relations between the countries, which was confirmed in the Joint Statement on New U.S.-Russian Relationship. The question of do the two countries need agreements of the type patterned on the Cold War-era treaties, or the "new relations" can be based upon the presidents' sympathies with each other, is now one of the most dicussed subjects in the media.
- They "Will be Able to Work Together in a Positive Way", - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Bai and Georgi Bovt, Izvestia, November 17, 2001)
- Did the Summit Justify the Hopes?, - in Russian, (by Sergei Sokut and Vadim Solovyev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 17, 2001) - an interview with Bruce Blair and Sergei Rogov
- Analysts Lukewarm on Nuclear Accord, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Friday November 16 2:42 AM ET)
- What did Putin and Bush Come To, - in Russian, (by Olga Koleva, Vesti.Ru, November 16, 2001)
- Summit's Outcome: Only Background was Nice, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Strana.ru, November 16, 2001)
- US-Russian Agreements May Have Already Been Reached, - in Russian, (by Anton Bilzho, Strana.ru, November 16, 2001)
- From Deterrence Potential to Potential of Trust, - in Russian, (by Vadim Markushin, Krasnaya Zvezda, November 16, 2001)
- Commit To Paper, (The Washington Post, Friday, November 16, 2001; Page A46)
- New Rules of the Strategic Game, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyev and Marina Volkova, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 15, 2001)
- Nuclear Algebra, - in Russian, (by Gennadi Gerasimov, Vremya MN, November 15, 2001)
- Russian President Vladimir Putin's Interview to National Public Radio, November 15, 2001
- Arms Treaties Old Hat?, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, Thursday, November 15, 2001)
- U.S. Arsenal: Treaties vs. Nontreaties, (by Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, November 14, 2001)
- President Bush, Russian President Putin Discuss New Relationship, Press Conference by President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin, November 13, 2001
- Joint Statement on New U.S.-Russian Relationship, November 13, 2001
At a press conference after the Summit, the presidents declared unilateral reductions of strategic nuclear arsenals. Many media comments regard this as a great achievement and all but a breakthrough in the nuclear arms reductions process, while in fact the press conference clearly showed the contrast in the approaches towards the nuclear arms reductions problems and the absence of any compromise over this issue. For further details see commentary by Eugene Miasnikov, Editor of the START Web Site No Breakthrough on Strategic Reductions at the Summit , which was published in Russian by Gazeta.ru on November 15, 2001. See also:
- The Tough Task of Nuclear Reduction, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Saturday, November 17, 2001; Page A03)
- Russia Official Blasts Missile Cuts, (by Jim Heintz, Associated Press, Wednesday, November 14, 2001; 11:22 AM)
- High-Tech Talk About Nuclear Weapons, (by Tom Raum, Associated Press, Wednesday, November 14, 2001; 5:37 AM)
- Mr. Putin Doesn't Trust Mr. Bush, - in Russian, (by Svetlana Nesterova, Gazeta.ru, November 14, 2001)
- Bush-Putin Summit: No START-ABM Deal, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Strana.ru, November 14, 2001)
- Bush and Putin Agree to Reduce Stockpile of Nuclear Warheads, (by David E. Sanger, The New York Times, November 14, 2001)
- Bush, Putin Announce Nuclear Arms Cuts, (by Karen DeYoung and Dana Milbank, The Washington Post, Wednesday, November 14, 2001; Page A01)
- Bush, Putin Agree to Cut Warheads, (by Ron Fournier, Associated Press, Tuesday, November 13, 2001; 8:30 PM)
- New Rules for Weapons Cuts, (The New York Times, November 14, 2001)
- A Familiar Bush Strategy on Disarmament, (by Peter Baker, The Washington Post, Wednesday, November 14, 2001; Page A06)
During President Bush and President Putin Talk to Crawford Students, US president appeared to commit himself to destroying the nuclear warheads eliminated when reducing the American arsenal. But National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice said later that only "a number of them" will be destroyed and suggested others would be stored:
- A Summit of Style Over Substance, (by Karen DeYoung and Peter Baker, The Washington Post, Friday, November 16, 2001; Page A01)
- Nuclear Differences Remain as Summit Ends, (by Dana Milbank, The Washington Post, Friday, November 16, 2001; Page A43)
- Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice on Visit of President Putin, Crawford Community Center, Crawford, Texas, November 15, 2001
- Remarks by President Bush And President Putin to Russian Exchange Students And Students of Crawford High School, Crawford High School, Crawford, Texas, November 15, 2001
At the Summit, US and Russian Presidents confirmed their original positions with respect to the 1972 ABM Treaty. According to an anonymous source within Bush administration, there was no deal on the missile defenses because Putin put forward a proposal unacceptable for Bush: test that do not comply with the treaty would have to receive a Russian approval. Nevertheless, according to US officials, the Summit gave a green light to the Pentagon's for missile defense testing and construction work that could violate the treaty sometime next year.
- U.S. to Pursue Missile Test Plans, (by Sandra Sobieraj, Associated Press, Friday, November 16, 2001; 1:00 PM)
- Missile Impasse: The Shape of the Deal, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, November 16, 2001)
- U.S. Testing Goes Ahead; Could Violate ABM Treaty, (by James Dao, The New York Times, November 16, 2001)
- Barbecues and Missile Shields, (The New York Times, November 16, 2001)
- ABM Treaty: Russia Made Its Presence Felt, US Turn Now, - in Russian, (Strana.ru, November 15, 2001)
- False Targets, - in Russian, (by Yelena Shesternina, Izvestia, NOvember 15, 2001)
- Compromise Is Possible, (by Vladimir Kuzar, Krasnaya Zvezda, November 15, 2001)
- Missile Shield Program Still Costly, (by Tom Raum, Associated Press, Tuesday November 13 4:41 PM ET)
See also our feature page How Should Russia Respond to the Impending US NMD Deployment?
Legislation approved Wednesday by a US Senate committee would let Russia reduce its $3.5 billion debt to the United States by working to limit proliferation of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction: Senate OKs Russia Debt Reduction, (by Carolyn Skorneck, Associated Press, Wednesday, November 14, 2001; 8:03 PM). See also:
- Analysts Debate Next Weapon in Al Qaeda Arsenal, (by Michael Dobbs and Peter Behr, The Washington Post, Friday, November 16, 2001; Page A18)
- Lax Nuclear Security in Russia Is Cited as Way for bin Laden to Get Arms, (by Steven Erlanger, The New York Times, November 12, 2001)
- Senior Russian Official Reveals Nuclear Material Theft Attempt, (by Michael Dobbs, The Washington Post, Tuesday, November 13, 2001; Page A22)
- U.S. Must Help Russia Diminish Nuclear Risk, (by Rose Gottemoeller, Los Angeles Times, November 12, 2001)
- GAO Testimony: Weapons of Mass Destruction: Assessing U.S. Policy Tools for Combating Proliferation, 7 November 2001 (in PDF format)
In the recent issue of The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists: British Nuclear Forces, 2001, (The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, November/December 2001, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 78–79)
November 13, 2001
Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with President Bush today. Reportedly, at least seven documents are ready for signing during the Summit, including joint statements on missile defenses and on nuclear arms reductions. Experts discuss the Summit's possible outcomes:
- Bush, Putin Begin White House Talks, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Tuesday, November 13, 2001; 12:01 PM)
- Allies De Facto , - in Russian, (by Sergei Rogov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 13, 2001)
- Putin, Starting U.S. Trip, Predicts Missile Accord, (by David E. Sanger, The New York Times, November 13, 2001)
- Officials Hope Russia Will Accede on Missile Defense, (by Dana Milbank and Karen DeYoung, The Washington Post, Tuesday, November 13, 2001; Page A02)
- Summit Is Not About Concessions, (The Moscow Times, Tuesday, November 13, 2001)
- Transforming Relations With Russia, The New York Times, November 12, 2001)
- Go South, Go To America, - in Russian, (by Svetlana Babayeva, Izvestia, November 12, 2001)
- Bush's Soul, - in Russian, (by Malor Sturua, Moskovski Komsomolets, November 12, 2001)
- Summit Hints, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 10, 2001)
- Heart-To-Heart Talk At Texas Ranch, - in Russian, (by Vissarion Sisnev, Trud, November 10, 2001) - interview with Yuri Ushakov, Russian Ambassador to the US
- Kremlin And Defense Ministry Work Out Criteria For Nuclear Arms Reductions, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Orlov, Strana.ru, November 8, 2001)
- Russian-American Word Of Honour, - in Russian, (by Yuri Golotyuk, Vremya Novostei, November 9, 2001)
- A Russian Volley over the ABM Treaty , (by Catherine Belton, Business Week, November 9, 2001)
- Summit In Texas And Prospects Of Russian-American Cooperation On Strategic Stability, (by Vladimir Orlov and Roland Timerbayev, PIR-Center, November 8, 2001)
- Summit US-Russia: "The Impossible Becomes Possible Today...", - in Russian, (SMI.ru, November 8, 2001) - comments by Russian experts and political scientist
- Alliance Forever, - in Russian, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, Moskovskiye Novosti, November 8, 2001)
- To the Crawford Summit, (by William Safire, The New York Times, November 8, 2001)
- Leftovers From an Old War, (by Karl F. Inderfurth, The New York Times, November 7, 2001)
- Arms Control: The First Line Of Defense, (by Daryl Kimball and Wade Boese, The Washington Times, November 7, 2001)
- October Lessons For Mr. Putin, - in Russian, (by Vasili Safronchuk, Sovetskaya Rossiya, October 5, 2001)
Interviews given by President Putin to Western media on the eve of the Summit received enthusiastic comments:
- Putin Urges A 'New Level' of the Trust With America, (by Michael Wines, The New York Times, November 11, 2001)
- Putin Confident of ABM Compromise, (by Judith Ingram, Associated Press, Sunday, November 11, 2001; 2:54 AM)
- Putin Sees Chance for Accord on ABM Pact, (by Susan B. Glasser, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 11, 2001; Page A42)
- Highlights of Putin Interview, given Saturday, November 10 to a group of American journalists in the Kremlin
- President Putin Answer Questions From Chief Correspondents Of Moscow Offices Of Leading American Media, - in Russian, (Moscow, Kremlin, November 10, 2001)
- Mr. Putin Expects To Understand Mr. Bush Correctly, - in Russian, (by Yekaterina Grigoryeva, Izvestia, November 9, 2001)
- Putin Sees Room to Maneuver On NMD, (by Associated Press, The Moscow Times, November 9, 2001)
- Excerpts from Russian President Vladimir Putin Interview to US Television Company ABC (the "20/20" program, host Barbara Walters), November 7, 2001
Last week President Bush, announced the decision to reduce US offensive weapons stockpile, refusing to disclose the proposed levels before the Summit. Eugene Miasnikov, the Editor of the START Web Site, comments on this event in his article President Bush's Nuclear Arithmetic. A short version of this article was published yesterday by Izvestia daily: "...US prefer to implement reductions unilaterally and do not want to conclude any binding agreement... President Bush's statement misuses the concept of 'reductions' -- the actual meaning used is 'decreasing the state of readiness' rather than elimination of the US strategic offensive weapons...". See also:
- Bush Says He Will Reduce Nuke Arms, (by Ron Fournier, Associated Press, Monday, November 12, 2001; 7:42 PM)
- Mr. Bush Will Present Mr. Putin 4000 Nuclear Bombs, - in Russian, (by Yelena Shishkunova, Gazeta.ru, November 8, 2001)
- Rice Downplays Hope for Russia Pact, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Thursday, November 8, 2001; 1:25 PM)
- Press Briefing By National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, November 8, 2001
- Remarks by President Bush And Prime Minister Tony Blair of Great Britain in Press Availability, November 7, 2001
Today Rossiiskaya Gazeta ran an article by Marshal Igor Sergeyev, Russian President's Adviser and former Defense Minister, where the author discusses th general problems of strategic stability and the role of nuclear weapons: Dropping a First Strike Strategy, - in Russian, (by Igor Sergeyev, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, November 13, 2001).
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace held two seminars devoted to the Summit. American congressmen and leading experts took part in these seminars. Transcripts are available both in text and audio formats:
- US-Russian Relations: Born Again Partnership or Marriage of Convenience?, Wednesday, November 07, 2001
- Crawford and Beyond: The Future of the U.S.-Russian Nuclear Relationship, Tuesday, November 06, 2001
The former Soviet negotiator draws the lessons of START Treaties negotiations: How Did the Yesterday's "Kitchen" of Negotiations Work, - in Russian, (by Nikolay Chervov, Obozrevatel-Observer, October 2001).
Recent publications contain thorough analysis of problems of US-Russian relations in strategic arms, and consider the prospective role of nuclear weapons:
- Russia and Global Security: Approaches to Nuclear Arms Control and Proliferation, (by Igor Khripunov, NBR Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 4, August 2001)
- Nuclear Weapons into the 21st Century, (Ed. by Joachim Krause and Andreas Wenger, Peter Lang Publishers, 2001)
The Pentagon called in top defense contractors over the weekend to discuss plans for streamlining management of the costly U.S. drive to build ballistic missile shields: Pentagon Asks Contractors to Mesh Missile Defense, (by Jim Wolf, Reuters, Wednesday November 7, 5:55 PM ET)
House Appropriations Committee is recommending canceling an expensive infrared satellite system that the Pentagon considers vital to missile defense:
- Missile Defense Early Warning Systems in Disarray, Panel Says, (by Tony Capaccio, Bloomberg.Com, November 7, 2001)
- Panel Recommends Ending Satellite Plan, (by James Dao, The New York Times, November 7, 2001)
New Bradley Graham's book tells the story of the development of the US ABM system. The New York Times published review and excerpts from the book:
- Missile Defense Strikes Back, (by Jeff Stein, The New York Times, November 10, 2001)
- 'Hit to Kill', (by Bradley Graham, The New York Times, November 11, 2001)
How great is the danger of nuclear terrorism? The press keeps on discussion of this issue:
- Senior Russian Official Reveals Nuclear Material Theft Attempt, (by Michael Dobbs, The Washington Post, Tuesday, November 13, 2001; Page A22)
- Lax Nuclear Security in Russia Is Cited as Way for bin Laden to Get Arms, (by Steven Erlanger, The New York Times, November 12, 2001)
- Peaceful Atom Under Martial Law, - in Russian, (by Yuri Golotyuk, Vremya Novostei, November 12, 2001)
- Toy-Weapon Of Mass Destruction, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Agamov, Utro.ru, November 12, 2001)
- Nuclear inactivity. Plant security issues of cost, responsibility still unresolved, (by Ross Kerber, Boston Globe, November 9, 2001)
- Nuclear Shadow Over The Earth. "Contamination Grenade" In Bin Laden's Hands?, - in Russian, (by Yuri Tyssovski, Wek, November 9, 2001)
- Nuclear Terrorism: Detonation or Contamination, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safronov, Izvestia, November 8, 2001) - an interview with Vladimir Dvorkin, science advisor with the Strategic Nuclear Forces Center of the Military Sciences Academy
- Report Finds 'Weakness' In Nuclear Controls, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Tuesday, November 6, 2001; Page A07)
"...The first train carrying spent nuclear fuel will come from Bulgaria... It is this train that confirms the fears: we'll easily receive the spent fuel, but may never see the money...": Remnants Of A Nuclear Reactor Smuggled Into Russia, - in Russian, (by Roman Shleynov, Novaya Gazeta, November 12, 2001)
November 6, 2001
Russian Foreign minister and the U.S. State Secretary are scheduled to meet today to work out the details of an agreement to be signed in November during to the President Putin's visit to the U.S. As The Washington Post correspondents learnt, the agreement would not scrap the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which U.S. officials said remains the ultimate goal of negotiations with Russia, but would allow the administration to move ahead with the vigorous testing and development program it hopes to begin early next year. Under this interim arrangement, both countries would also set goals for slowly reducing the number of strategic warheads to between 1,750 and 2,250 each.
- It's Not in A Cowboy's Bag, Yet, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Grigoryev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 6, 2001)
- Partnership Is Growing, - in Russian, (by Vadim Markushin, Krasnaya Zvezda, November 6, 2001)
- Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Georgy Mamedov Meets with US Under Secretary of State John Bolton, Russian MFA Official Statement, November 5, 2001
- An Internet Discussion: What Is Going to Happen to the ABM Treaty?, - in Russian, (Inosmi.Ru, November 5, 2001)
- Making progress on missiles, (Financial Times, November 4, 2001)
- Moscow Made the Way for Washington, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 3, 2001)
- Russian Seems to Rule Out Chance of Arms Pact at Summit Talks, (by Michael Wines, The New York Times, November 3, 2001)
- Bush Will Offer Nuclear Cuts to Sway Russia, (by Michael R. Gordon and David E. Sanger, The New York Times, November 2, 2001)
- U.S., Russia Cite Gains In Missile Talks, (by Alan Sipress, The Washington Post, Friday, November 2, 2001; Page A26)
- Progress on Cutting Nuclear Stockpiles, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Friday, November 2, 2001; 6:05 AM)
- Igor Ivanov Will Librate America of Spare Weapons, - in Russian, (by Nikolay Agarkovski and Andrey Ivanov, Kommersant, November 2, 2001)
- US and Russia move towards missile agreement, (by Stephen Fidler and Andrew Jack, Financial Times, November 2, 2001)
- U.S. and Russia Move Closer to Agreement on Warheads and Missiles, (The Associated Press, November 1, 2001)
- Missile Defense Deal Is Likely. U.S.-Russia Accord Would Allow Tests, Preserve ABM Pact, (by Walter Pincus and Alan Sipress, The Washington Post, Thursday, November 1, 2001; Page A01)
- U.S. to Tell Russia How Many Warheads Could Go, (by Robin Wright, Los Angeles Times, November 1 2001)
- Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Igor Ivanov Answers Questions At Press Conference On Outcomes Of Talks With US Secretary Of State Colin Powell, Washington D.C., November 1, 2001
- Opening Remarks by Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Igor Ivanov At Press Conference On Outcomes Of Talks With US Secretary Of State Colin Powell, Washington D.C., November 1, 2001
Defense Minister Rumsfeld's visit to Moscow was also devoted to the November's summit meeting preparation. Rumsfeld avoided answering to the question when the U.S. intends to withdraw from the ABM Treaty at the press-conference with the Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov. He said, that he'd leave it to the president of the United States:
- Rumsfeld and Putin Praise Cooperation, (The Moscow Times, Monday, Nov. 5, 2001, Page 1)
- Rumsfeld, on Visit to Russia and Central Asia, Meets Putin, (by Michael Wines, The New York Times, November 4, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Arrives for Pre-Summit Talks in Russia, (by Vernon Loeb, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 4, 2001; Page A28)
- Who'll Raise His Hand On a Relict? - in Russian, (by Alexander Shmelyov, Vesti.Ru, November 4, 2001)
- Putin and Bush Will Violate the ABM Treaty Together, - in Russian, (by Artyom Vernidub, Gazeta.Ru, November 4, 2001)
- Secretary Rumsfeld Press Conference with Russian Minister of Defense, Moscow, Kremlin, November 3, 2001
- Rumsfeld, Ivanov Help Set Stage for Bush, Putin Summit, (by Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service, November 3, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Arrives in Russia, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Saturday, November 3, 2001; 12:03 AM)
- Rumsfeld makes Moscow visit to strengthen ties, (by Mary Dejevsky, The Independent, November 2, 2001)
Development of events shaping the future of nuclear reductions and the ABM Treaty to large extent corresponds to scenarios outlined in our Center's report U.S.-Russian Relations in Nuclear Arms Reductions: Current State and Prospects, (ed. by Anatoli Diakov) published in June. Complete Russian version of our report is currently available on-line (in PDF, 350 Kb).
See also recent interviews and papers of our Center's experts in the press media:
- Obstacle As A Part And A Parcel. What Will Happen To The ABM Treaty In November, - in Russian, by Pavel Podvig, Izvestia, October 29, 2001)
- We Can't Jump Through The Ceiling, - in Russian, by Oleg Denisov, Wek, October 26, 2001) - an interview with Anatoli Diakov, Director of our Center
- Rumsfeld Strengthens The ABM Treaty In Order To Abandon It, - in Russian, (by Pavel Podvig, SMI.RU, October 26, 2001)
See our special section How Should Russia Respond to the Impending US NMD Deployment?
In the November's issue of Arms Control Today:
- Will Prudence Prevail?, (by Daryl G. Kimball)
- What If the New Strategic Framework Goes Bad?, (by Joseph Cirincione and Jon B. Wolfsthal)
- Pentagon Puts Off Missile Defense Testing, Citing ABM Treaty, (by Wade Boese)
- U.S., Russia Still Seeking Common Ground on Missile Defense, (by Wade Boese)
- Powell Says China ‘Subdued’ About Missile Defense, (by Wade Boese)
- Back to Normal. Democrats Say Debate on Missile Defense Not Over, (by Wade Boese)
The Pentagon put the October test of a missile defense interceptor on hold and spent weeks looking for what had gone wrong. The culprit turned out to be nothing more than an aging capacitor in a software evaluation station: Testing Mishaps Cloud Missile Defense Plans, (by Bradley Graham, The Washington Post, Monday, November 5, 2001; Page A02)
Units of the Strategic Rocket Forces and Space Forces conducted a test launch of "Topol" ICBM from Plesetsk on Thursday ("Topols" Do Not Rust, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Vovk, Krasnaya Zvezda, November 3, 2001)
Experts are concerned about safety of nuclear installations to possible terrorist attacks. Governments around the world are tightening security at nuclear facilities as the International Atomic Energy Agency is warning that nuclear terrorism "seems far more likely in the wake of Sept. 11." "We don't want to alarm anybody, but we now have to prepare for the worst-case scenario -- a terrorist who obtains some kind of nuclear weapon," Mohamed ElBaradei, the IAEA director general, said in an interview.
- Report Finds 'Weakness' In Nuclear Controls, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Tuesday, November 6, 2001; Page A07)
- Reactors and Their Fuel Are Among the Flanks U.S. Needs to Shore Up, (by Matthew L. Wald, The New York Times, November 4, 2001)
- Nuclear Experts' Nightmare: Terrorists Steal a Warhead, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 4, 2001; Page A06)
- Are Nuclear Plants Secure?, (by Michael Grunwald and Peter Behr, The Washington Post, Saturday, November 3, 2001; Page A01)
- Experts Discuss Chances of Nuclear Terrorism, (by Peter Finn, The Washington Post, Saturday, November 3, 2001; Page A19)
- Agency Warns of Nuclear Terrorism, (by T.R. Reid, The Washington Post, Friday, November 2, 2001; Page A10)
- U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex: Security At Risk, (The Project On Government Oversight, October 2001)
- Aleksandr Rumyantsev, the Head of the Russian Ministry of Nuclear Energy: «Our Devices Will Identify Any Terrorist», - in Russian, (by Gennady Voskresensky, Wek, N 43, November 2, 2001)
- Nuclear Bomb Is Very Close, - in Russian, (by Boris Talov, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, November 2, 2001)
- Some Major Challenges: Nuclear Non-Proliferation, Nuclear Arms Control and Nuclear Terrorism, (IAEA Director General Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, Statement to the Symposium on International Safeguards: Verification and Nuclear Material Security, October 29, 2001)
Earlier this year, the U.S. government proposed budget cuts for the DOE's nonproliferation programs in Russia, but these have not been as big as expected. As part of a larger energy bill, the House of Representatives and Senate approved last week $804 million for all NNSA's nuclear nonproliferation programs in 2002, $69 million down on 2001 funding, but $30 million more than the amount requested by the administration: Taking Scientists Out of Nuclear Equation, (by Elizbeth Wolfe, The Moscow Times, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2001, Page 1)
Georg Borisov, The Head of a Group of the U.S.-Russian Committee on Disposal of Surplus Plutonium and an affiliate of Bochvar's Institute thinks that, the U.S. side is to blame in the absence of progress in solving the problem of plutonium disposal: Plutonium. What Is Going to Happen to the Agreement?, - in Russian, ("Mayak" PO, Chelyabinsk-65, November 1, 2001)
Bo Gustavson, Senior Vice-President of the Swedish Department of Nuclear Fuel and Waste Disposal tells about prospects of construction of an interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel at "Mayak" Production Plant: A Promising Cooperation, - in Russian, ("Mayak" PO, Chelyabinsk-65, November 1, 2001)
After approving nuclear spent fuel import bill, Russia is going to get the first train from Bulgaria for reprocessing. However, the scheme of payment looks very suspicious, which means, Russia may never get the money: The Train 1 With Nuclear Fuel Is Coming to Russia, - in Russian, (by Roman Shleynov, Novaya Gazeta, November 5, 2001)
November 1, 2001
MIT Press has published a new book Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces (ed. by Pavel Podvig). This edition is part of the Russian Nuclear Forces Project of the Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. It provides comprehensive data about Soviet and Russian strategic weapons, payloads, and delivery systems and on the nuclear complex that supports them. The data are drawn from open, primarily Russian, sources, and all the information is presented chronologically, arranged by individual systems and facilities, and is not available elsewhere in a single volume.A US-Russian summit scheduled for mid-November will likely happen to be a key event that would decide the future of the relations between the two countries in the area of strategic weapons. Particularly, the summit may clarify the fate of the 1972 ABM Treaty. In his interview to Wek weekly, Anatoli Diakov, director of our Center, said that "...an agreement with Americans over missile defenses can be reached in principle. One of the possible compromise settlements could be a treaty that would allow Americans to develop NMD, while at the same time setting a common limit for offensive and defensive weapons. Speaking on numerical limitations, one could choose say 2,000 warheads. In this case, if US develops a missile defense system deploying 200 interceptors, they will have to limit their offensive arsenal to 1,800 warheads. If Russia does not deploy missile defenses, the limit of warheads on their offensive systems will be 2000..."(We Can't Jump Through The Ceiling, - in Russian, by Oleg Denisov, Wek, October 26, 2001). In his article published in Izvestia daily, Pavel Podvig, an expert with our Center stresses: "...Complications with exact wording of amendments [to the 1972 ABM Treaty - E.M.] that would be acceptable for both sides are significant, but not unsurmountable. For example, since amendments will destroy the basis of the treaty in any case, we can remove most limitations, keeping only one -- the ban on development of an ABM system that would be capable to defend against a full-scale attack..." (Obstacle As A Part And A Parcel. What Will Happen To The ABM Treaty In November, - in Russian, by Pavel Podvig, Izvestia, October 29, 2001). See also:
- Missile Defense Deal Is Likely. U.S.-Russia Accord Would Allow Tests, Preserve ABM Pact, (by Walter Pincus and Alan Sipress, The Washington Post, Thursday, November 1, 2001; Page A01)
- Bush-Putin Boost US, Russia Relations, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Thursday, November 1, 2001; 12:41 AM)
- On the Way to Texas, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Verlin, Vremya MN, November 1, 2001)
- U.S.-Russia Summit May See ABM Deal, (by Richard Balmforth, The Moscow Times, Monday, Oct. 29, 2001. Page 3)
- Bush Adviser Says Russia Is Warming to U.S. ABM Tests (by David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker, The New York Times, October 28, 2001)
- Eliminate the tools of future terrorism, (by Mikhail S. Gorbachev, Boston Globe, October 28, 2001)
- Official Says Putin Visit Could Bring Missile Agreement, (Los Angeles Times, October 27, 2001)
- Toward A Strategic Framework, (The Washington Post, October 24, 2001)
- Missile Pact Still Divides U.S., Russia, (by Sharon LaFraniere, The Washington Post, Tuesday, October 23, 2001; Page A19)
- A Bush-Putin Deal, (Wall Street Journal, October 23, 2001)
- Bush, Putin to Tackle Arms Control at Summit, (by James Gerstenzang, Los Angeles Times, October 23, 2001)
- Bush, Putin Fail to Resolve Argument Over Necessity for 1972 Missile Treaty, (by Edwin Chen, Los Angeles Times, October 22, 2001)
- Edging Toward a Deal With Moscow, (The New York Times, October 22, 2001)
Recent meeting of presidents Bush and Putin at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Shanghai served as an important step in preparations for the summit at Bush's Texas ranch in November:
- Bush and Putin Agree to Agree, (by Patric E. Tyler, The New York Times, October 22, 2001)
- The President: Bush and Putin Declare They Can Alter ABM Pact, (by David E. Sagner, The New York Times, October 22, 2001)
- Bush, Putin Schedule Talks on Missile Plans, (by Mike Allen and Philip P. Pan, The Washington Post, Monday, October 22, 2001; Page A01)
- Text: Press Conference Given by Bush and Putin (October 22, 2001)
- Remarks by President Putin of Russia and Answers to Questions from Journalists at a Joint Press Conference with President Bush of the United States Shanghai, October 21, 2001
- Road to U.S.-Russia Alliance Is Still Unmapped, (by Michael Wines, The New York Times, October 21, 2001)
- Strategic Relations: Russia and U.S. Optimistic on Defense Issues, (by Patric E. Tyler The New York Times, October 19, 2001)
US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced Thursday that the Pentagon had indefinitely postponed preliminary tests of missile-defense technology to avoid any suggestion that it had violated the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty with Russia. Commenting on the Rumsfeld's statement Pavel Podvig notes that "...making a point on adherence to the ABM Treaty today, US administration at the same time makes preparations for withdrawal tomorrow... In this situation the most important thing for Russia is to keep from being deluded itself too much, and to try and make everything possible to convert the desire demonstrated by the US to find a solution for the problem of the future of the ABM treaty together with Russia into a concrete agreement that would remove the tension surrounding this problem..." (Rumsfeld Strengthens The ABM Treaty In Order To Abandon It, - in Russian, by Pavel Podvig, SMI.RU, October 26, 2001)
- Bush's Repayment: Two Tests Of The "Nuclear Shield" Canceled, - in Russian, (by Vissarion Sisnev, Trud, October 29, 2001)
- U.S. Missile Test Delayed For Technical, Not Political, Reasons, (by Tony Capaccio, Bloomberg.com, October 29, 2001)
- "Mini-Embargo" On NMD Tests, - in Russian, (by Yulia Petrovskaya, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, October 27, 2001)
- To Be Friends Without Bargaining, - in Russian, (by Evgeni Berlin, Vremya MN, October 27, 2001)
- Russia Plays Down U.S. Missile Decision Suspension of Two Tests Seen as a Promising Sign, (by Susan B. Glasser and Peter Baker, The Washington Post, Saturday, October 27, 2001; Page A24)
- Missile Defense Tests Are Put Off. U.S. Delay Averts Face-Off With Russia, (by Alan Sipress and Bradley Graham, The Washington Post, Friday, October 26, 2001; Page A01)
- Missile Test Postponement Shows Priority Shift, (by Steven Mufson, The Washington Post, Friday, October 26, 2001; Page A04)
- 3 Missile Shield Tests Postponed, (by Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times, October 26, 2001)
- White House delays missile-defense tests, (by Mark Matthews, Los Angeles Times, October 26, 2001)
- Pentagon Puts Off Missile Tests, (by Brian Knowlton, International Herald Tribune, Friday, October 26, 2001)
See also our feature page How Should Russia Respond to the Impending US NMD Deployment?
The Russian delegation together with the delegations of Belarus and China, has introduced a draft resolution on the preservation of and compliance with the Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems (AÂÌ): Statement by Sergei A. Ordzhonikidze, Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation in the First Committee of the 56th session of the UN General Assembly on the issue of the ABM Treaty, 23 October 2001
A group of US Senators introduced a bill S. 1565 "Relating to United States adherence to the ABM Treaty". Russian MFA made a statement in support of this bill (Russian MFA Press Release, October 25, 2001). See also:
- Terrorism Shifts Priorities, (USA Today, October 24, 2001)
- Misguided defense, (Boston Globe, October 23, 2001)
Alexander Yakovenko, the Official Spokesman of Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that in return to the closure of the radioelectronic center in Cuba Russia expects reciprocity with regard to the radar in Vardo, Norway (Alexander Yakovenko, the Official Spokesman of Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Answers a Russian Media Question About US President George Bush's Remark on the Announcement of the Withdrawal of the Russian Radioelectronic Center from Lourdes, Cuba
Gen.-Col. Igor Valynkin, Head of the 12th Main Directorate of the Russian Defense Ministry, comments publications in Western media that discuss a possibility of Russian nuclear weapons coming to hands of international terrorists: "...Publications of this kind appeared before. I believe that this is some kind of propaganda. In reality we did not lose anything, we do triple accounting of not only nuclear munitions themselves, but of their components as well..."
- Assessing Risks, Chemical, Biological, Even Nuclear, (by William J. Broad, Stephen Engelberg and James Glanz, The New York Times, November 1, 2001)
- Can A Nuke Really Fit Into A Suitcase? (by Bill Saporito, Time, October 29, 2001)
- Terrorists Steal Up To Nuclear Arsenals, - in Russian, (by Mikhail Khodarenok, Vladimir Georgiev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, October 27, 2001)
- Igor Valynkin: "Russia Can Conduct Nuclear Tests Should The Need Arise", - in Russian, (by Alexander Orlov, Strana.Ru, October 26, 2001)
- 'Dirty' Bomb Could Wipe Out Thousands, (The Times, October 26, 2001)
- 'A Five-Star Disaster For The World', (by Giles Whittell, The Times, October 26, 2001)
- Apocalypse now?, (by Giles Whittell, The Times, October 23, 2001)
- The Ultimate Hatred Is Nuclear, (by Bruce G. Blair, The New York Times, October 22, 2001)
On the current state and security of the Russian non-strategic nuclear arsenal see also: The September 1991 PNIs and the Elimination, Storing and Security and Storing Aspects of TNWs, (by Joshua Handler, a presentation at a United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research seminar, 24 September 2001) (in PDF format)
House Democrats lost an effort Tuesday to add money to a program aimed at keeping Russian nuclear weapons away from terrorists. By voice vote, House lawmakers working with senators to craft a compromise energy and water spending bill rejected an effort by Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Texas, that would have added $131 million to a $173 million program that helps Russia guard its nuclear facilities (House Dems Lose Russian Nukes Move, by Alan Fram, Associated Press, Tuesday October 30 9:09 PM ET). See also:
- Improving U.S.-Russian Nuclear Cooperation, (by Kenneth Luongo, Russian-American Nuclear Security Advisory Council, October, 2001)
- A Chance to Avoid Nuclear Disaster, (by Brett Wagner, Los Angeles Times, October 28, 2001)
Last Friday Russian Strategic Rocket Forces (SRF) conducted a training launch of RS-18 (SS-19 Stiletto) ICBM. The missile has been on duty in one of SRF divisions for more than 25 years ("Stiletto" Doesn't Miss, - in Russian, Krasnaya Zvezda, October 30, 2001)
In accordance with the START I Treaty fulfilment procedures, 27 out of 30 ICBM silos have been eliminated in Altai, three silos remain to be destroyed: Liquidation Of ICBM Silos Recommenced in Altai, - in Russian, (ITAR-TASS, October 24, 2001)
The first railroad mobile combat missile complex is to set off from Bryansk to Baikonur for disposal: A Strategic Missile Combat Mobile Complex Prepared For Disposal In Accordance With The START II Treaty At The "Plesetsk" Space Launch Range, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Anufriev, ITAR-TASS, October 16, 2001)
Ukraine completed elimination of strategic offensive weapons. On October 30th, they blew up the last silo in which an RS-22 (SS-24 Scalpel) ICBM has been deployed:
- Kiev Has No Missiles, - in Russian, (by Yuri Golotyuk, Vremya Novostei, October 31, 2001)
- Ukraine Destroys Last Missile Silo, (by Marina Sysoyeva, Associated Press, Tuesday October 30 12:50 PM ET)
- Ukraine Destroys Last Nuclear Missile Silo, (by Reuters, Tuesday October 30 8:23 AM ET)
- US Will Fund Nuclear Threat Reduction Programs in Ukraine Till At Least 2006, - in Russian, (UNIAN (Ukrainian Independent Information News Agency), October 25, 2001)
In the US, debates over resumption of the B-2 stealth bomber production flared up again:
- Northrop's B-2 Stealth Bomber Re-Emerges As Focus Of Pentagon's Battles Over Budget, (by Andy Pasztor and Anne Marie Squeo, Wall Street Journal, October 24, 2001)
- Air Force Chief Opposes Purchase Of More B-2s, (by Greg Schneider, The Washington Post, October 24, 2001)
In the recent issue of Yaderny Kontrol (July-August 2001):
- Creation of the CTBT Verification Mechanism (by Victor Slipchenko and Oleg Rozhkov)
- How to Avoid Apocalypse? (by Sam Nunn)
- On the Issue of Importing of Spent Nuclear Fuel to Russia, (by Vladimir Rybachenkov)
According to Vasili Zhidkov, General Director of chemical and mining complex in Zheleznogorsk "...noise about Minatom digging a "hole" for nuclear wastes from all over the world are the same type of rubbish, as speculations of pseudo-experts about a nuclear dump established on the "wet" depository of spent nuclear fuel at the RT-2 plant...", (Unsuccessful Search for Nuclear "Dump" near Krasnoyarsk, - in Russian, by Yuri Chuvashev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, October 30, 2001)
Forty years ago, in the end of October, 1961, Earth survived the historical test of the most powerful H-Bomb, however environmental consequences of that explosion affect the health of generations: Giving the Gruel, - in Russian, (by Alexander Kondrashov, Argumenty i Fakty, October 26, 2001 ã.)
What Was New?
In 2001: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October
In 2000: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1999: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1998: January | February | March | April | May | June | July-September | October | November | December
In 1997: November | December
© Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, 1999-2001Search the START Web Site